Myth, Mayhem, and a Dash of Old English: Inside 'William Tell (2025)

The story unfolds in the 14th Century amidst the days of the Holy Roman Empire where Europe's nations fiercely vie for supremacy and the ambitious Austrians, desiring more land, encroach upon Switzerland, a serene and pastoral nation.

https://youtu.be/1B_YB3caN80

Ever since I can remember, movies that combine historical intrigue with a heavy dose of European passion have been my guilty pleasure. When the trailer for “William Tell” rolled onto my screen, complete with the alluring presence of Jonathan Pryce, the dignified gravitas of Ben Kingsley, and the young, swashbuckling charm of Jonah Hauer-King, I knew I was in for something special. And let me tell you, sitting in a dimly lit basement with my popcorn clutched in one hand and a pint of cynicism in the other, I was ready to be taken on a tumultuous ride back to the 14th century—a time when Europe was less about avocado toast and more about burgeoning empires, grim battlefields, and the occasional philosophical musing on life.

“William Tell” unfolds amid the turbulent days of the Holy Roman Empire, where nations squabble over supremacy like toddlers over the last piece of cake. In this film, the serene and pastoral Switzerland finds itself under the unwanted gaze of ambitious Austrians hell-bent on staking their claim. It’s a tale of land, blood, and guts—a narrative steeped in both passion and peril, not unlike trying to decipher the banter at a French family dinner. Despite the glaring historical inconsistencies (more on that later), the film plunges headlong into the very essence of European drama, serving up battles so visceral and tense that I half-expected my seat to start trembling.

The performances are nothing short of a master class in acting. Jonathan Pryce brings a sort of regal arrogance to his role, embodying a character that could best be described as “ancient wisdom meets stubborn antiquity.” Pryce’s portrayal is layered with the kind of subtle charm that makes you think he’s seen it all—yet remains unimpressed by the mediocrity of modern civilization, even if this role is rather minor to the overarching story. Then there’s Ben Kingsley, whose mere presence is enough to elevate any script into the realm of the sublime. Kingsley offers his usual blend of gravitas and mystery, though at times his dialogue felt like it belonged in a dusty old tome written in Old English—a language that, for all its historic allure, might leave some of us modern viewers grappling with a twinge of confused ennui.

And let’s not forget Jonah Hauer-King, the film’s young blood whose cocky charm and bright-eyed intensity promise that even in the midst of brutal skirmishes and tense standoffs, there’s always room for a little less intensity. He effortlessly bridges the gap between the storied past and the impulsiveness of youth, often providing a touch of humor that cuts through the somber march of history. Watching Hauer-King, I couldn’t help but think: if I’d been around back then, perhaps I too could have been a dashing rogue with some barely contained wit—though, with my luck, the only apple I’d be shooting at would be a tax form.

One of the most enticing aspects of “William Tell” is its unabashedly European flavor. There’s something about European films that crackle with an intensity, a fervor, that feels both timeless and ineffably tragic. You can almost hear the echoes of centuries past, the myriad voices of long-forgotten heroes, and yes, even the ghost of an apple waiting to be decapitated—or rather, to be split from its twig-like perch atop someone's unsuspecting head. (Historical note for the trivia buffs: there’s no concrete evidence that the legendary William Tell even existed. The earliest written account springs from the “White Book of Sarnen,” a curious relic from the 15th century that hints more at myth than reality. And that famed apple-splitting stunt? It may very well owe its origins to the saga of Toko, a minor character in the epics surrounding Danish King Harald Bluetooth. Talk about genealogical confusion!)

Despite the historical footnotes and the labyrinthine dialogue, “William Tell” delivers when it comes to pure, unadulterated battlefield spectacle. The film is peppered with an impressive array of fight scenes that are choreographed with the precision of a Swiss watch—a nod, perhaps, to the very country under siege in the film. Battles erupt with the kind of raw energy that makes you wish you could join the fray (or at least cheer from the sidelines with a roaring “Opa!” at just the right moment). There’s plenty of tense moments too, where the air is so thick with anticipation that you’d swear you could slice it with a finely honed rapier.

Now, let’s talk about what didn’t quite hit the mark. As much as I adore immersing myself in the rich tapestry of historical narratives, the dialogue sometimes wandered off into the murky realm of Old English—a veritable linguistic obstacle course that left my ears working overtime. Imagine trying to follow a conversation in a language that sounds like it was designed by Chaucer after a particularly spirited night at a medieval tavern. Sure, it adds to the ambiance, but sometimes I found myself reaching for a translator, half-expecting a live phonetic breakdown on the side of the screen.

And then there’s the finale. Just when the tension was nearly at its peak, the film decided to pull the rug out from under us with an ending that fizzled out faster than a deflated soufflé. I was left with the nagging sensation that just as I was about to get the carnal justice I so desperately craved, the director opted for a genteel “fade to black” instead of a climactic showdown. It wasn’t the grand, teeth-gritting standoff I had anticipated—more like an anticlimactic tea party, where everyone politely sips Earl Grey and discusses the weather. This sudden anticlimax left me feeling as though I’d invested in a roller coaster ride that ended with a very flat carousel.

Despite these hiccups, “William Tell” is not without its merits. It’s a film that boldly straddles the line between myth and history, offering a refreshing, if imperfect, lens on a beloved legend. The film doesn’t shy away from the grandiosity of its setting—a tumultuous Europe where every castle and countryside is brimming with tales of valor, treachery, and perhaps a little romantic whimsy. If you’re a fan of films that pack a punch with both their visual flair and their passionate, if occasionally perplexing, dialogue, then this movie is definitely worth your time.

Perhaps that’s the secret sauce of “William Tell.” It doesn’t get bogged down by a need for perfect accuracy or a flawless narrative arc. Instead, it relishes in its contradictions—the noble yet perplexing dialogue, the heart-stopping battles juxtaposed with moments of unexpected levity, and that tantalizing blend of myth and reality that leaves you wondering if you’re watching a documentary or a brilliantly off-kilter reenactment by your most charmingly eccentric history professor.

In the end, while “William Tell” might not have delivered the swoon-worthy justice we were all craving in its final act, it more than made up for it with its audacious style, unforgettable performances, and a story that dances effortlessly between the realms of the epic and the absurd. So, if you’re in the mood for a film that combines the fire of European passion with moments that are as tender as they are turbulent (and with a cast that’s simply irresistible), “William Tell” is your ticket to a wild ride through time—and perhaps a reminder that sometimes, the legend is far more entertaining than the fact.

6.5/10

#WilliamTell #HistoricalEpic #JonathanPryce #BenKingsley #JonahHauerKing #EuropeanCinema #LegendOrMyth #EpicBattleScenes #FilmReview #MovieNight